|               
			 
			  
						
						
						
						FAIR GAME  
			
Director: Doug Liman 
 
Featuring: Naomi Watts, Sean 
Penn  
  
When Jo Wilson wrote 
an Op Ed piece in the New York Times in 2003 saying that the Bush administration 
had massaged reports about the Iraqi weapons of mass-destruction to justify the 
Iraq War, some elements in the White House took it upon themselves to wreck his 
life and the life of his wife, whom they revealed to be an CIA agent. Her life 
was put at risk, as were the lives of her many contacts. The couple were branded 
traitors but both fought back, with the support of elements of the liberal 
press. Ultimately, White House staffers lost their jobs.  
 
Naomi Watts and Sean Penn do a good job of conveying a marriage under 
unbelievable pressure and director Liman (who began the Bourne franchise by 
directing The Bourne Identity) harvests thrills out of battles they have with 
the government.  
 
All The President’s Men this ain’t and Liman hasn’t followed the route of fellow 
Bourne director, Paul Greengrass, who was able to make Green Zone (a kind of 
companion film) more of a shoot-em-up thriller by telling the story of the 
search for WMDs on the ground in Iraq.  
 
But this remains intense, intelligent film-making –although it also seems 
something of a stale story seven years on when Afghanistan is these days the 
daily headline story.  
 
 
   
						
						
						
						  
						
						
						
						ALL GOOD THINGS 
			
Director: Andrew Jarecki
 
Featuring: Ryan Gosling, 
Kirsten Dunst, Frank Langella.  
  
Documentary 
film-maker Jarecki might have been expected to film this story 
based-on-an-unsolved 1982 murder case as non-fiction, given the massive success 
he had in 2003 with Capturing The Friedmans, his documentary about a popular 
children’s entertainer which turned into an expose of father and son sex 
abusers.  
 
But he’s decided to make it his feature film debut – and quite a debut it is. 
Gosling plays the wealthy son of a rich New York family whose wife (Dunst) 
disappears. 20 years later the case is reopened and Gosling also seems to be 
linked to the death of his best friend (by a bullet to the back of the head) and 
an elderly neighbour.  
 
Dunst is exemplary as the unsuspecting wife who too late starts to get 
suspicious of her definitely freaky husband. Gosling really lives the (very) 
warped character of the possible murderer. There are rumours that he fell out 
with the director during the intense shoot and that he found such an 
unsympathetic character difficult to play. He does a fine job.  
 
The film isn’t perfect by any means – it gets muddled from time to time – but it 
promises much for Jarecki for the future.  
 
 
 
 
   
						
						
						  
						
						
						
						
						CATFISH 
			
Director: Henry Joost, Ariel 
Schulman  
Featuring: Joost, Schulman 
etc  
  
Mr Jarecki is one of the producers of this mysterious and mostly entertaining 
documentary. In New York, directors Joost and Schulman document an internet and 
phone relationship developing between Schulman’s photographer brother (and 
flatmate), Nev, and a singer/songwriter, Megan, a couple of thousand miles away. 
Nev and Megan are in touch because Megan’s 8-year old sister did a painting of 
one of Nev’s photographs and emailed it to him.  
 
As the virtual relationship develops, Nev gets drawn into Facebook and phone 
contact with all Megan’s family. But something isn’t right. Joost and the two 
Schulman’s set off to find out the truth about Megan. And the truth is a not 
wholly surprising but a moving and intriguing twist.  
 
If it is the truth. The filmmakers have been accused of passing off a fiction 
film as a documentary. They insist what they call a “reality thriller” is the 
real thing, not a set-up, but there is stuff that doesn’t quite hold up.  
 
Fake or fact, Catfish is still worth a look.  
 
   
						
						
						
						  
							  
							
								
									
									  | 
								 
							  
						
						
						UNSTOPPABLE 
			
Director: Tony Scott 
 
Featuring: Denzel 
Washington, Chris Pine, Rosario Dawson  
  
A 
driverless train loaded with combustible material is heading for a densely 
populated area at breakneck speed and Washington and Chris Pine are the only men 
who can stop it. That’s all you need to know, really. Scott’s camerawork and 
cutting is as dizzily frenetic as ever – can directors have Attention Deficit 
Disorder? Sometimes you wish this man would just sit still and let his actors do 
the work they’re paid for? Having said that, once that 6:5 special is racing 
down the track his jumpiness fits right in.  
 
Washington and Pine have a believable relationship – the former a railway vet 
being forced to retire, the latter a posh kid opting for blue collar experience 
- but they don’t have much time for character development among all the flashy 
crash, bang, wallops.  
 
Enjoy it for the action – and check out Konshalovsky’s The Runaway Train (made 
back in the day when Eric Roberts was a contender) for a similar ride.  
 
   
						
						
						
						  
						
						
							
						
						THE NEXT THREE DAYS 
						
						
						Director: Paul Haggis  
						Featuring: Russell Crowe, Elizabeth Banks, Brian Dennehy, 
						Liam Neeson  
  
						
						
						This remake of a basically 
						implausible French movie seems an odd choice for 
						writer/director Paul Haggis, whose films Crash and The 
						Valley of Elah were harrowing, realistic dramas. There’s 
						realism here, too, especially in the relationship 
						between Crowe and Banks – who both do fine work – but 
						the notion that a college professor (Crowe) should turn 
						into action man to break his wife (Banks) out of the 
						prison in which she’s been incarcerated for murder, is 
						too much for this viewer to take in what is otherwise a 
						realistic film.  
						 
						Nuance is added because we don’t know whether Banks is 
						guilty or innocent for most of the film and there are 
						many tense and dramatic moments in the film. For 
						instance, Crowe funds the break and the getaway by 
						committing an armed robbery on a meths lab. The acting 
						is uniformly excellent.  
						 
						This is definitely a film worth seeing but, ultimately, 
						it disappointed me simply because I couldn’t buy that 
						initial premise.  
						 
   
			
						
			
						
						
						
						
						
						  
						  
						
						
							
						
						THE TOURIST 
						
						
							Director: Henckel von Donnersmarck  
							Featuring: Johnny Depp, Angeline Jolie, Paul Bettany, 
							Steven Berkoff  
						
						Reading 
						months ago about this first-pairing of two of the 
						world’s best-looking people in a thriller set in Venice 
						gave me a sinking feeling. It had Knight and Day and 
						Salt written all over it. (Indeed Tom Cruise was 
						originally cast in the male lead, as he had been in Salt 
						before - spookily! - Jolie had played Salt.).  
						 
						Then I read that the director of the awesome, 
						Oscar-winning, The Lives of Others was on board to 
						direct this and I thought that could be interesting. I 
						was wrong.  
						 
						Putting Depp and Jolie together for the first time must 
						have seemed a great idea for the sexual chemistry – 
						except there ain’t any. Second rule of sex in the 
						movies: if we know they’re happily in partnerships in 
						real life, it’s not sexy. (The First Rule is: the same 
						applies but more so if they are that partnership in real 
						life.)  
						 
						Worse for me, Jolie’s public persona - mad as a bag of 
						snakes, accumulating children - gets in the way of me 
						taking her seriously as an actor.  
						 
						So you’re left with two good-looking actors in a 
						thriller set in Venice directed by an Oscar-winning 
						director. Still could be good. With Steven Berkoff as 
						the bad guy? The director is channelling Beverley Hills 
						Cop? Except that film had humour and energy and cracked 
						along at a good pace.  
						 
						The Tourist muddles along. It’s a remake of French film 
						Anthony Zimmer so I guess they’re saddled with the plot. 
						They could have made the dialogue a bit more sparkling 
						though.  
						 
						The film starts out with Jolie trailed around Paris by 
						Scotland Yard men. She is instructed by the former lover 
						the cops are after to go to Venice by train, pick out a 
						man who looks like her former lover and persuade the 
						police it’s him.  
						 
						Naturally the man she chooses is Depp. (He must get told 
						he looks like other men all the time.) Then there are 
						chases and romance and twists and a final twist that 
						depending on your point of view is crap or, well, pretty 
						much crap.  
						 
						Let’s hope for better for all concerned for the future. 
						From April Depp will be working with Tim Burton yet 
						again on the film of the 1960s vampire soap opera Dark 
						Shadows. Jolie, meanwhile, is directing her first film: 
						a romance set during the 1990s Bosnian war. And that’s 
						all I have to say about that 
						 
						 
   
			
						
			
						
						
						
						
						
						  
						  
						
						
							
						
						BURKE & HARE  
						
						
						Director: John Landis  
						
							Featuring: Simon Pegg, Andy Serkis, Tom Wilkinson.  
						
						
						
						Oh dear. John Landis made one terrific scary comedy – An 
						American Werewolf In London – a long, long time ago. The 
						story of Burke and Hare isn’t inherently scary, it’s 
						just sad as these impoverished Edinburgh drunkards 
						murdered their even more impoverished lodgers and sold 
						their bodies to doctors teaching anatomy.  
						 
						Landis, Pegg and Serkis do their best to mix the horror 
						and the laughs but Pegg’s limited comic schtick has worn 
						thin by now and I found the film hard-going. The story 
						is so thin Landis has added a bizarre sub-plot involving 
						Burke and an all-female production of Macbeth that has 
						nothing to do with anything.  
						 
						Maybe I just wasn’t in the mood - I know other critics 
						enjoyed it - but I found the whole thing dire 
						 
   
			
						 
						
						   
			
			
			
			
			
			
			Back to top 
			
			
			    
			
			  
			
			  
			
 |